Bringing up the old case again? Hyundai/Kia models involved in the lawsuit only involves difference of 1-2mpg that is just mere 0.43km/L to 0.9km/L difference. The standard FC reading is taken from traffic in city and highway dated back in 1990's. US city and highway today are much more crowded with more bumper to bumper crawl.
If the law is to take into full consideration by taking FC reading based on today's traffic, then Japanese, US and conti brands too must be re-evaluated and if liable to lawsuit, these older carmakers would suffer more serious losses.
When automotive consumer rights group is established here after the big event, more likely your company will be next. The light foot contest is best evidence against you bunch should the owners lodged complain. Sylphy claimed 16km/L city, actual only 9km/L, difference of 16.5mpg = 7km/L. Rather than the company being held responsible, they might divert the attention to you bunch instead. The idea came from you bunch and approved by you bunch, so you will have no choice but to be kicked out of the company. You broke the law, you kena.
Not a very good excuse to convince the market that Hyundai and Kia are not cheating the customers. By the way, it is not really an old story. It involves the latest models!!!!
You should try harder.
Hey, I am still waiting for your so-called mata mata to catch me and kick me out
Let me tell you one thing, you are really a loser. We are still waiting for you to establish the so-called consumers rights group. You can't even write your own blog lah.
Only LOSERS like you will harp on the word "IF"....... You should post your replies as:
1) What if I have worked harder?
2) What if I have told the truth?
3) What if I don't go around and embarass myself?
4) What if I am a billionaire etc?
There're just too many IFs!!!