Close
g88 missing?
Started by
cham2020
, Nov 20 2004 09:14 AM, 321 replies to this topic
#23
Posted 20 November 2004 - 11:14 AM
hey suresh.. notice that yer attracted to g88 discussions
hmmm..
well unless its in a NMT thread like this? hehe
hmmm..
well unless its in a NMT thread like this? hehe
#25
Posted 20 November 2004 - 11:17 AM
well cham.. i suppose everything is related eh hehe
btw i wasnt criticising this thread lar dude..
its nice to talk kok mar hehe
btw i wasnt criticising this thread lar dude..
its nice to talk kok mar hehe
#26
Posted 20 November 2004 - 11:26 AM
if you check my previous posts, i hv always maintained that g88 should be
more selective in posting. i hv no issue abt discussion not-proton topics
here, or anywhere, but the manner of posting is of concern. g88 seems
bent to make sure he has the last word on each and every topic. this is
even when he does not have anything constructive to add. sometimes, he
shoots his replies without even digesting the post first, hence giving
the wrong information.
there was once i created a thread on 'last word' where i was being
sarcastic in saying that g88 had missed having the last word because a
particulat thread was locked. he didnt get it and replied something
nonsensical. also, i said there was an unlock thread where he wasnt the
last poster, four pages down, and i 'urged' him to rush to it to make
sure he became the last poster. he didnt get that sarcasm either.
but on the positive side, i do acknowledge that he has helped many
newbies. he also seems to not flame as much as he used to.
more selective in posting. i hv no issue abt discussion not-proton topics
here, or anywhere, but the manner of posting is of concern. g88 seems
bent to make sure he has the last word on each and every topic. this is
even when he does not have anything constructive to add. sometimes, he
shoots his replies without even digesting the post first, hence giving
the wrong information.
there was once i created a thread on 'last word' where i was being
sarcastic in saying that g88 had missed having the last word because a
particulat thread was locked. he didnt get it and replied something
nonsensical. also, i said there was an unlock thread where he wasnt the
last poster, four pages down, and i 'urged' him to rush to it to make
sure he became the last poster. he didnt get that sarcasm either.
but on the positive side, i do acknowledge that he has helped many
newbies. he also seems to not flame as much as he used to.
#28
Posted 20 November 2004 - 11:34 AM
I would said
info+humour is ok lah
but blurr+humour is no no
BTW he is in shanghai kekeke
info+humour is ok lah
but blurr+humour is no no
BTW he is in shanghai kekeke
#29
Posted 20 November 2004 - 11:35 AM
suresh i agree on you for g88 at the top portion. hehehe.. the last portion
not really agree with it. ahhaha..
not really agree with it. ahhaha..