Road Test: Toyota Rush
It may be basic but the Rush is a pretty good looking car and the Toyota badge means it will be painless to run
In the grand scheme of things, most people are not looking for outright performance or ultimate luxury when buying a car. The average buyer has to juggle competing factors such as good looks, reliability, comfort, price and cost of maintenance, not necessarily in that order.
The Toyota Rush is a compact Sports Utility Vehicle that has been engineered to suit the pockets of as many people as possible. That means Toyota had to make adjustments to the specifications and trim level to bring prices down.
I am not suggesting that the Rush cheap, at nearly RM86,000 for the entry level machine, this is not something that everyone would say is affordable but it is certainly not exorbitantly priced.
While it may look like an all-new vehicle, Toyota is using their huge parts bin to come up with this vehicle. The platform is modified from the Avanza, the engine and drivetrain are shared with the Avanza while the some parts of the interior can also be found in the Avanza.
Since they have to worry less about engineering so many things. Toyota designers had more time to come up with something pleasing to look at and the Rush is certainly that. It sits in that zone between plain and pretty.
It’s like that next door girl who has almost the right curves, she is not model material but sometimes you do think about her.
Just like that girl next door, the Rush comes from a good family and you know that she has had a proper upbringing and not likely to embarrass you in front of your friends. The Rush may not be your first choice but she certainly won’t be your last option.
There are nice details abound. For example in the top Spec 1.5S Automatic model that you see here comes with projector lamps and the whole front lamp cluster is packaged in a modern looking and sleek chrome surround that is bubbled in clear plastic.
They frame a neat grille and a substantial bumper that has been nicely scalloped and cut to make room for a large air vent and a pair of driving lamps. Completing the SUV look is a pseudo sump-guard that is part of the plastic bumper moulding.
The Rush comes with grey plastic garnish around the wheel arches and it looks good but the front right one on ours came off after a bit of fast driving. I think they did not stick it on properly. No one else reported the same problem.
The rear lamp cluster takes some cue from the more expensive RAV-4 and this adds sophistication to the stern view of the Rush.
When it comes down to personal taste, I have issues with spare tyres hanging in full view of the public. I am not worried about someone stealing it, its just I think spare tyres should be tucked away from sight. I keep mine out of public view, my car should too.
The Rush also has a good heart in the 1.5 liter VVT-i 3SZ-VE which is good for 109 horsepower if you work it all the way to 6,000rpm and 141 Newton metres of torque at 4,400rpm.
While these are the same figures found in the Avanza, it is actually good enough to keep the Rush at highway speed all day long and the selection of ratio is just right to make it feel reasonably energetic in the city.
Thanks to a bit more noise insulation than the Avanza, engine noise is also well isolated, which will encourage drivers to work the motor a bit harder and make the Rush a bit more fun than the Avanza.
In terms of road handling, the Rush’s fatter tyres give it more grip and this means that you can attack corners more aggressively in it than the Avanza. However the tall body and softer springing makes it roll a bit more in bends so you should no hurl it into curves with abandon.
The taller tyres and suspension are also more forgiving on bumps and potholes, this makes the Rush less bouncy than the Avanza. In fact it is considerably less bouncy than the Avanza. Remember I said LESS bouncy, I did not say NOT bouncy.
Most buyers will be reasonably contented with the Rush’s performance and would focus more attention in the quality and presentation of the cabin. Here there are some hits and a few misses.
Lets start with the driving position. I am about six-foot tall and I like to sit upright when driving, just like my driving instructor taught me. When I sit upright, the top of the steering wheel is positioned just so that it blocks the very top of the instrument cluster.
It is not a big issue but it is annoying.
The steering wheel is set quite upright so you cannot feel like you are driving a car and that is a few points knocked off the otherwise very presentable interior.
The interestingly styled instrument binnacle houses a full-dial speedometer that is flanked by a half-dial rev counter to the left and temperature gauge cum gear indicator in another crescent on the right.
At the bottom of the speedo is a small rectangular Liquid Crystal Display showing fuel level as well as trip and odometer. Everything is presented in a satisfyingly clear and simple fashion.
The centre console is stacked with the radio on top where it is easy to reach, followed by a pair of simple rectangular air-conditioning vent and the hazard light switch while below that is the air-cond blower and vent control dials.
Nothing fancy but it works well enough. The metallic plastic finish does not have the most luxurious lustre but it does its job lifting the otherwise plain dashboard.
If there is anything that front passengers would complain about, it is the lack of cupholders. What Toyota did was create a round receptacle in front of the moulded door pocket for mineral water bottles or drinks can but it is not ideal.
You have to bend down quite far to reach it, making it completely useless for the driver.
I know we are not suppose to be drinking while driving but it is nice to have somewhere to put your liquid sustenance, especially if you are on a long lonely drive.
The second row of seats is a comfortable place to be with sufficient knee room if you don’t have particularly lanky front passengers. The seat design is simple and flat which means that they are not particularly supportive but not uncomfortable either and like in the Avanza, rear passengers get their own air conditioning vent.
Don’t underestimate the importance of a second air conditioning control in a car like this, especially given the hot weather we get in Malaysia. I have driven in more expensive MPV’s without rear air-cond control and had to put up with either frozen knuckles or children whining from the heat.
Second row passengers are also better off than front row people, cup holder wise….
When it comes to the third row of seats, the Rush is like most other compact seven-seaters in that they are only suitable for smaller children, especially on long drives.
Adults can endure it for about half an hour before cramps start setting in. Third row passengers are also better off than front row passengers, cup dolder wise, they are set in the moulded side arm rest, within easy reach. perfect.
I know I am taking too many pot shots at this cupholder issue but this is a real life concern. I lived with the car for a weekend and it is the only thing that really annoyed me so I think it will also be the thing that will annoy most owners in the long run.
Next we look at the load carrying ability of the Rush. With the third row up, there is barely room for a few small soft bags, again a typical trait of seven-seaters so you cannot take too much offense here.
With the third row out of the way, there is ample room for a few suitcases or even a small item of furniture.The side opening doors swing out almost 90 degrees to provide unobstructed access to the load area.
Some may prefer a top-hinged arrangement but the side-hinge solution was necessary because they needed space for the spare wheels. It is too big to fit underneath the car.
Looking back, I think the girl next door analogy is perfect for the Rush. It is undoubtedly a vehicle full of compromises but then again so is our life and at least in the case of the Rush we know that the shortcomings are really minor and you can easily live with it. Just like that girl next door, the more you look at her, the more you feel like falling in love.
Summary of specifications
Toyota Rush 1.5S Auto
Technical
Engine: 1.5 liter VVT-i 3SZ-VE
Max Power: 109hp @ 6,000rpm
Max Torque: 141Nm of torque at 4,400rpm.
Four Speed Auto (Five Speed Manual)
16-inch alloy wheels
215/65R16 tyres.
Macpherson strut front suspension.
Four-link rear suspension with live axle.
Creature comforts
Single disc MP3-capable head unit
6 speakers (4 speakers plus 2 tweeters).
Power retractable door mirrors,
Leather wrapped gear lever and steering
Dual SRS front airbags
Anti-lock brakes and electronic brakeforce distribution.
Price List
Toyota Rush 1.5G M/T – RM85,888
Toyota Rush 1.5G A/T – RM88,888
Toyota Rush 1.5S A/T – RM94,888
The interior looks very plain for something you’re paying well over RM80k for, don’t you think?
Biker V, interior is Vanilla plain… but it’s quite easy to live with
Except for the shell, its ‘soul’ its avanza 1.5, i thinkf its quite expensive to pay 25k more for the shell.
Can you share about the petrol consumption level ? 1km = RM ?
The car is pretty ok on “smooth surface” , i had the chance to drive it when i was in indonesia with my friends, he bought at around RM 42000+ /130 million rupiah. Do note that the sound insulation isnt up to the standard, but overall, it’s a pretty decent suv if we consider having it in indo.(cheap!)
RM42k only in Indonesia? … That’s very cheap!
In Malaysia, a cheap Indon car can become so expensive. For an interior that looks plain & cheap, it doesn’t deserve the toyota badge. Just my opinion…
The centre console looks cheap to me, even a proton has better looking centre console.
It would be better with a Daihatsu badge wouldn’t it? But it’d still be the same car.
Good review but it’s full of apologies and justifications for the way this SUV is packaged….which would not arise if the price is more commensurate with the given general level of quality & refinement (read cheap). Alas might as well plonk a Toyota badge on a super-mini sized Proton and it will still sell for a RM100k.
it does look cheap for a 100k rm car mainly coz it costs less than that 42k rm stated.
i think we should avoid buying this just to show toyota we dont want low quality, underpowered expensive cars.
what is the max speed for this car? Is it better than the toyota unser?
I used to own one. I liked it quite a bit, but the deal-breaker for me was its very limited off-road capabilities. The price in Indonesia for the S trim with manual transmission is about US$18.5k
do someone know if it will be sold in Mexico?, We’ve got the avanza, but the rush’s shell looks prettier.
Can any one tell me how is the power like. i.e when moving uphill with say 5 adult passengers.
I happened to see one Rush next to an X-trail and was surprised that they are about the same size from the back and sideway length. The X-trail 2 litre was abit underpower when I test drive it few years back. With 1.5 cc, I am more worried.
How did the noise level compared to new CRV, any idea
It’s the same car than daihatsu terios.
whats the rm (rm86,000)? basicly i want to now its price when you buy it brand new for a mt 4wd lets say….is there a new model of rush?rush 1 rush 2 etc or its just this the only rush model taken from toyota,cause i read a couple of articles about the toyota rush and im a bit confused if theres a new and older model/s…can anyone please help me?thanks anyway….
I am not a car expert. Just wondering, if i need a 7 seater to drive from KL to Ipoh during holidays, but most of the time in KL for normal use. Have 2 kids and old parents. Maybe go for shopping purpose. But other times, will drive around alone to work. Image to work is slight concern because Avanza/Inova is pretty box-looking. Also, got budget constraint because don’t want to get anything above Rm100k.
So, with such a need, do you think Rush is still the only car in Msia that can meet the needs of people like us? I liked Toyota Wish, but it cost about Rm147k, which is about RM50k more. Can use this for other investment purpose. Pls advise if you have some other cars of similar capacity i.e. 7 seater. Thanks
Paul;
Indonesia already launch the new Rush 2010, it is a facelift model with some changes in the front grill, but it’s only 5 seater (in Indo Rush only come with 5 seater I heard), you may check it under the following website: http://www.belitoyota.com, do known UMW Toyota will launch this model in Malaysia or not??
familytree;
P2 have launch a model (P2 Alza) it’s also a 7 seater, but size is smaller.Grand lavina & Rondo also fall under these catagery (below 100k), but personally I feel Rush better, more Class mah…., planning to get one already…
I bought this A/T Toyota Rush model for RM90K early this 2010 with a high expectation on a toyota brand. This model designed specially for urban terrain.. and when we refer to Malaysia.. it maybe referred to its township road and highway.. But reality is not there.. If you drive a rush on highway (with a smooth surface) or even on any federal road, you could experience an extraordinary bum (toyota term “flopping”).. even when 5-6 people on board.. exactly similar with what we experience during driving on a grooved road surface.. and toyota accepted this characteristics as Toyota Rush characteristic. Nonsense.. For those who need a smooth and convenient driving.. not only good appearance.. and looking for this model.. my advise is.. do a 10 km test driving and decide yourself.. You’re not entitle to complaint then.. just sharing.