Jump to content

Welcome to Autoworld Forum !

Sign In or Register to gain full access to our forums. By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

Close
Photo

satria 1.3 VS. Kancil 0.850


  • Please log in to reply

#1
mco174

Posted 06 March 2007 - 04:00 PM

mco174

    Driver

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 38 posts
Deall all,




Your input is required to compare the satria 1.3 with the kancil 0.850...
Lets choose the following criteria for comparison:
1. FC
2. Price
3. Power
4. Looks

As far as i know, for FC kancil is better, how much better, i don't know
satria 1996 is around 10-11K, Kancil 1997 is around 7-8K
staria is more powerful, however the kancil 0.850 is not that bad
staria looks better however, its still a 2/3 doors car.

tq

#2
4g13p

Posted 06 March 2007 - 04:47 PM

4g13p

    Fast & Furious

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,251 posts
Kancil, of course!

#3
kilogram

Posted 06 March 2007 - 11:59 PM

kilogram

    Fast & Furious

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,076 posts
you compare a 1.3 car with 850 car?? Better you compare a 2.0 car with a
1.5!

If you wanna compare a 1.3 car...compare it with another 1.3 car. Like
that only fair. How can you compare a much bigger cc car with a smaller
one?

#4
cucuk

Posted 07 March 2007 - 09:12 AM

cucuk

    White Lightning

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6,137 posts
go test drive the cars ler, u forgotten about ride comfort & space, if it
matters to you

#5
mco174

Posted 08 March 2007 - 12:20 PM

mco174

    Driver

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 38 posts
dear all,

kancil 850 can still be compared with staria 1.3
the difference in cc is not that big, we are not comparing a 2.0 with a 1.
0....
the second second is that both kancil and satria are under the category
small cars, if you know what i mean
however satria is wider and is more confortable.
i have driven both cars, and satria is way a better.
i just wanted some inputs from those who own satria.
for the FC of satria 1.3, i still didn't get a reply, anyone knows?
do ask me to go to another forum, i have already checked the other forum
but the FC posted is not realistic...
Those of you who claim thats buying a french car or a foreign car in
malaysia is better, think twice.
Price wise any rebnault/peugeot/citroen 1996 is less than 8K
But maintenance is very high, i know this for a fact.
as yourself a question, why the price of a tiara 96 is around 3k now? don't
fool yourself.

rgds


#6
fkmfkm

Posted 08 March 2007 - 08:22 PM

fkmfkm

    White Lightning

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5,021 posts
65% difference not big ??

#7
TheGunner

Posted 08 March 2007 - 08:30 PM

TheGunner

    Knight Rider

  • Staff
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,953 posts
Using my Iswara 1.5A (which consumes 20 sen/km) as a base for estimation,
I would venture a guess that a Satria 1.3 would return a figure between
15-17 sen/km.

If you are willing to consider a Satria 1.5M (very limited in numbers) or
1.6, I reckon you will get even better figures, not to mention a higher
level of trim and equipment.

I can't speculate for a Kancil 850 though.

#8
mco174

Posted 09 March 2007 - 09:46 AM

mco174

    Driver

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 38 posts
thanks gunner

what i have been told for a satria is that FC is 12.5km/L, which is more or
less what you have said.
buying a new car now is NOT GOOD, as its price will drop dramatically in
the next few years.
E.g. buy a saga 2007 for 27K, whats its value in 3 yrs, i guess 14K
buy a satria 10K, whats its value in 3yrs, i guess 6K

how much you lose when you buy a new car after 3yrs period, well, at least
13K gone!
but a second hand car much less than that, 4-5K lost.
Even if you throw away the car, you won't lose more than 10K....

You get what i mean.
One of the forumers said: "SAY NO TO NEW CARS"

I totally agree with him

By the way, in france, i 3yrs old car, its original price drops to the
thrid.
I.e. if the new car costs 6000 euros, after 3 years, its price is 2000euros
thats less than RM 10000 my friends.

rgds

#9
WKM425

Posted 09 March 2007 - 07:15 PM

WKM425

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 118 posts
I'm using satria 1.3 2001 november (Injection). I get 13.5cent per km, and
the best i did was the 12.5. I think this is because i weigh about 100kgs
and that would explain the extra cents in fuel. hahaha

#10
g88

Posted 09 March 2007 - 11:31 PM

g88

    Duke of Hazzard

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 48,280 posts
Item 1 to 4, most significant is 3 since power to weight ratio.