Naza did not prepare 2.0SX test unit for test drive preventing it from expanding rapidly. Aren't you telling others about the kluk kluk sound in your Sylphy when steering? Yes, the public is not stupid and the false facts spread by infectors and infected will no longer work. What edge do you have when Sylphy is throwing price like mad from direct and indirect discount amounting to RM6-12k? Don't you see the resale value of used Sylphy dropping more than RM20k for first year? That is worse than Korean cars.
Sylphy won award because of infection and false facts spread through gimmick lightfoot contest. The Forte won awards worldwide, not just here. Where's Sylphy standing in the world today? Mind you the good thing about Forte is not just the price but its build quality, reliability, durability and practicality with good FC. Though Forte SX has push start button, it can still be started with key if the push start failed.
Unlike the new Teana that relies heavily on the push start button alone without failsafe backup. That means you will have to call tow truck just because the push start button contact in dirty preventing you from starting the car. To open the boot of Teana is like Sylphy where you have to use electric power to open. In case of emergency when battery died at middle of no where late at night, I wonder how long would you take to open the boot without any light.
You know what, you are getting more and more idiotic nowadays. Naza poor sales for the Forte 2.0 is due to lack of test drive vehicles???? Come on, you need to think harder. Neither your boss will forgive you that the poor sales is due to non availability of test drives. What lame excuse!!!!
If the car is really sellable, what is the cost of a test drive compare to the business potential you can generate. According to you, everyone is infected. Only the sik siu siu pan toi piu jayraptor is not. I think you must be damn sour that Nissan didnâ€™t offer you a share (if your baseless accusation is really true) Can I say that the Maybank Automotive Award panelists are infected too? Please be rational and think with your brains. Comments from your backside is not welcomed and also reflected how foolish you are. But, I am just amazed on how low you can stoop.
I am tired of responding to all your fictional stories on the Sylphy particularly the breakdowns, but the feedbacks and results from the market is an adequate evidence that the Sylphy is a better performer. It also demonstrates the confidence of the market on Nissan Sylphy instead of Kia Forte. But that doesnâ€™t mean the Kia Forte 2.0 is a lousy car. If huge discounts is the only way to win market share, I will suggest Naza to do the same. Let me give you a tip again, the low price strategy will work for the Kia 1.6 but not the 2.0 (think again, why is this so???) I will teach you if you apologize. Ha Ha Ha
My advice is that potential car buyers should take a test drive on the vehicles instead of relying on the forum merely (you know there are lots of so called infected forummers here as what the sik siu siu pan toi piu claims, even though himself is one of them).
I view car ownership as an emotional subject. So, sometimes you may fall in love with a particular vehicle despite its inherent weaknesses. No cars are perfect anyway. Thus, it is a matter whether you can accept the shortcomings.
I am not a Nissan staff but just beh tahan with comments from an uncompetent Naza representative. For the Naza management, if you are seeing this, please educate your staff will you! At least, teach him not to concoct false stories as that is very unethical and misleading.