[hantualfa]

dear all,

really wanna to know about the FC for the harrier 3.0vvti


thanks in advance

[alldisc]

its a V6 rite? auto tranny? big and heavy body? bulky tyres?

well, dont expect too high on its FC. maybe sumting like 6km per litre. i
dont think it can do any better than that. unless constant drive at 90kph.

all the factors above are enemies to FC.

[GuyM]

Bro,

U wan move up the ladder wit Harrier 3.0 V6, u should be able to afford
the fuel la and fuel should be yr last concern. If u wan buy Altis,
Vios,, Rush then understood la

[alldisc]

or maybe, upgrade to alfa 168 super or 166. also 3.0 V6, with the
sweetest engine sound you can get.

[fkmfkm]

camry should have a very good fc on highway...

[alldisc]

not to deny the camry's good FC on cruising speed, but i believe
hantualfa wants to get a 3000cc car. or, in this case and SUV

[fkmfkm]

camry also go bigger cc car right ?

[dereklaw]

last time, one kawan of mine, the FIL wanted to give (transfer) his
Harrier 3.0 not sure what year lah but this was few years ago to this
fren of mine.

My fren said that he want to test drive the Harrier for about 2 weeks
before deciding. At the end of the 2-weeks, he told his FIL thanks very
much but he can't afford to pump the petrol. Its a guzzer in city
driving but highway its quite ok.

Thats how much petrol the Harrier consumes but maybe your version is more
fuel efficient but a 3L car, fuel consumption cannot be your priority.

[Justicebao]

If one can afford the latest Harrier 3.0VVti...I would believe FC won't be
the main concern. If FC is a concern, just take the 2.4L version lor. At
least can save quite a lot on the r/tax yearly.

[hantualfa]

just wanna t know...am i wrong? whats the exec figure for urban / long distance


thanks