Campro is a success ?
#1
Posted 09 September 2005 - 08:33 PM
but it is also better than korean BETA engine . at least .
take political issue out from here .
not good but not worst , that is what i can say .
#2
Posted 10 September 2005 - 03:01 AM
Outside of Malaysia it's a disaster but you guys are still subsisdising
the misguided who make the mistake of buying Proton; Not that they can be
many, probably counted on your fingers and toes.
#4
Posted 11 September 2005 - 10:58 PM
wait for version 2 hopefully before P1 tapau.... hehehe
#5
Posted 11 September 2005 - 11:48 PM
bad! Listen from the horses mouth!
#6
Posted 12 September 2005 - 10:28 AM
the horse mouth I listen to said lack of power & fuel consumption very
high! he regrets buying one now! so who should I listen to someone I know
that does not post in forum or ppl posting in forums but donno the
background can be salesman also rite?
#7
Posted 13 September 2005 - 01:00 PM
1.The Waja is still using the Mitsu 4G18? After all, the Cam(tak)Pro was
tested and developed utilising the Waja first before even the Junk2
existed, and therefore fitting in the engine is definitely not a problem.
And since the Cam(tak)Pro was developed so that Potong would not need to
buy engines from others in order to cut costs, and since the Waja until
today sells in greater numbers than the Junk2, this question needs to be
answered lor...
2.The Sawi using a Renault powerplant? And the crap about the Sawi 'being
developed around the Renault 1.2 engine' cannot be tolerated as the Cam
(tak)Pro is already in existence and in use then, and it is a fact that
the 1.3 version of the Cam(tak)Pro really existed (from internal sources).
3.And the much and oft delayed launched of the SRM.... is it because they
are sourcing and testing a different engine from another manufacturer as
the long-term tests on the Cam(tak)Pro proved that it is flawad? Hmmm.....
#8
Posted 17 September 2005 - 02:27 PM
good it would be in the Savvi. Lotus were given the project to develop
the CamPro unit to suit various capacities and it's either very bad
management or bad engineering but either way the Savvi should have the
capability to fit the unit.
#9
Posted 17 September 2005 - 10:08 PM
do.His Royal Highness has no choice coz during his ruling years,most of His
project ended up as failures.Perwaja for example.Therefore to save His
hyprocite face,he therefore has no choice but to defend Proton another 1 of
his brainchild.Apart from that Proton be it directly or indirectly enrich
not only himself but his cronies as well.
#10
Posted 18 September 2005 - 09:39 AM
1) Camtakpro will be phased out leaving them with their pants down:-
a) Very bad trade-in value - its already the case NOW and will be worse
in the very near future;
b) Bad FC will be much worse when the wear and tear accelerates due to
its high-revving nature;
c) Blardy expensive spare parts situation will worsen considerably in the
very near future due to the complete lack of economies of scale; and,
d) Many will be servicing a loan for 7 years for a junk worth less than
50% in less than 4 years, which they probably cannot sell since the
market will be flooded with unwanted Gentuts with market eventual
opening with WTO commitments due 2008.