Gen2 CPS vs Gen2 IAFM
#1
Posted 23 May 2008 - 04:27 PM
Just wondering is there any significant differences (Pick up) between the
CPS engine and IAFM in Gen2 at the low end portion?
As I can recall, the IAFM units in Gen is around 20Kg lighter than the
CPS.
Thanks.
#2
Posted 23 May 2008 - 05:36 PM
I think Gen.2 IAFM nobody will buy la since Persona also use that.
#3
Posted 23 May 2008 - 06:00 PM
Perhaps I should stated only the different in the engine not the car.
IAFM vs CPS low end power. Both 1.600cc
#4
Posted 26 May 2008 - 01:12 PM
Gen.2 DONT BUY IAFM.
The Persona would be a better buy because it is equipped with IAFM as well.
More spacious, and the rear seats are more comfortable.
Also seats are same with GEN.2 IAFM, use Fabric but different design.
#5
Posted 30 May 2008 - 11:57 AM
for handling, cornering...gen2 still rules.
go and try both then you know.
#6
Posted 30 May 2008 - 12:25 PM
as well get the Persona. Since there was no Gen2 CPS to test, the next
best thing for me was to take the Waja CPS for a spin. I was pleased with
the handling and pickup. Xenon headlights is a plus. Low end torgue is
good. Gen2 IAFM feels heavy. Yet to try the Gen2 CPS yet.
#7
Posted 30 May 2008 - 01:46 PM
But i like waja hehehe...espcially the side mirror can flip.
#8
Posted 30 May 2008 - 04:20 PM
both CPS and IAFM in pick after all.
Sorry to have this doubt on CPS and IAFM will have same amount of pick up
power as i read the tech spec about both engine.
I thought the extra 15hp generated by the CPS is due to the high cam of
the CPS which switched during high rpm and the pick is handle by the VIM.
As per tech spec explaination the VIM is just a electric version of the
IAFM which makes no differences.
Thanks for the information sharing.
#9
Posted 08 April 2013 - 03:28 PM
#10
Posted 10 May 2013 - 10:45 AM
humm... sounds like iafm is better for "most likely usage" in city areas.....