R3 vs vtec
#1
Posted 30 March 2005 - 01:04 PM
up with a honda vtec. obviously the vtec has more power, but the R3 weighs
only 985kg rite? anybody heard of such encounters?
#2
Posted 30 March 2005 - 10:47 PM
from F1 tech & damn powerful. Even the honda is heavier than R3, but honda
vtech gearbox is very efficient in delivering the HP to wheel.
#3
Posted 31 March 2005 - 03:58 AM
honda's will be better
#4
Posted 31 March 2005 - 08:42 AM
Honda is using front toe control link strut suspension and rear reactive
link double wishbone suspension.
R3 is using Fr: Performance-tuned MacPherson struts, uprated coilsprings,
revised static ride height and camber and 19mm anti-roll bar
Rr: Multilink system with performance-tuned dampers, uprated coil springs
and revised static ride height.
Doublewishbone is more mean for handling & performance.
#5
Posted 31 March 2005 - 12:43 PM
and about F1 tech in vtec....honda is not doing good in F1 either...
but for sure we cant compare HONDA with PROTON....HONDA have a far
better engineering than PROTON...but about chasis...PROTON have LOTUS on
their side...LOTUS 1 of the world best chasis maker....
#6
Posted 31 March 2005 - 05:24 PM
Don't believe manufacturer stats alone. Best is to get a factory stock
VTEC and compare test results. 1/4 mile, 0-100...etc. All tests should be
done with a standardized device like G-Tech Pro or RSM w/gforce sensor.
Anyway, 4G93P is a dinosaur engine
BTW, R3 isn't exactly Lotus tuned. The chassis and suspension design was
done in-house at Proton Motorsports.
#7
Posted 31 March 2005 - 07:42 PM
lotus surely involved in this project .
but then over all is done by proton morosports .
#8
Posted 31 March 2005 - 11:09 PM
record holder for HP to ratio of weight. Honda is doing good for past few
years, the only problem is budget. But lotus is retired from F1 for many
years already... maybe their technology is not so advance right now.
but defitanely honda chasis & suspension is better than Lotus.
#9
Posted 31 March 2005 - 11:12 PM
Stock EK9 0~100 km/h : 7.3 sec.
Stock 4G93P (R3) 0~100km/h: 8++ sec
so u think which is more powerful?
#10
Posted 31 March 2005 - 11:29 PM
Stock 4G93P (R3) 0~100km/h: 8++ sec
so u think which is more powerful? "
My friend, an R3 owner already tested his car on the century sprint with
a G-Tech Pro. Result?
7.23 sec
But I think that EK9 driver could do better