Jump to content

Welcome to Autoworld Forum !

Sign In or Register to gain full access to our forums. By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

Close
Photo

R3 vs vtec


  • Please log in to reply

#1
ar145

Posted 30 March 2005 - 01:04 PM

ar145

    Road Warrior

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 621 posts
no flame post here, just curious to know if the flagship satria could keep
up with a honda vtec. obviously the vtec has more power, but the R3 weighs
only 985kg rite? anybody heard of such encounters?

#2
PotenzaG3

Posted 30 March 2005 - 10:47 PM

PotenzaG3

    Fast & Furious

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,776 posts
Honda Vtec is powerful. weight is 1 factor, but the Vtec engine is develop
from F1 tech & damn powerful. Even the honda is heavier than R3, but honda
vtech gearbox is very efficient in delivering the HP to wheel.

#3
valve15

Posted 31 March 2005 - 03:58 AM

valve15

    Road Warrior

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 672 posts
i wouldnt wanna compare r3's engine with vtec..maybe r3's chassis with
honda's will be better

#4
PotenzaG3

Posted 31 March 2005 - 08:42 AM

PotenzaG3

    Fast & Furious

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,776 posts
Are u sure? R3 chasis is better than Honda?

Honda is using front toe control link strut suspension and rear reactive
link double wishbone suspension.

R3 is using Fr: Performance-tuned MacPherson struts, uprated coilsprings,
revised static ride height and camber and 19mm anti-roll bar
Rr: Multilink system with performance-tuned dampers, uprated coil springs
and revised static ride height.

Doublewishbone is more mean for handling & performance.




#5
aleebinmad

Posted 31 March 2005 - 12:43 PM

aleebinmad

    Fast & Furious

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,080 posts
but R3 is under LOTUS TUNE....

and about F1 tech in vtec....honda is not doing good in F1 either...

but for sure we cant compare HONDA with PROTON....HONDA have a far
better engineering than PROTON...but about chasis...PROTON have LOTUS on
their side...LOTUS 1 of the world best chasis maker....

#6
prozac51

Posted 31 March 2005 - 05:24 PM

prozac51

    Fast & Furious

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,676 posts
Which VTEC is the R3 being compared to? Big? Small? DC5? EG6? EK9? Jazz?
Don't believe manufacturer stats alone. Best is to get a factory stock
VTEC and compare test results. 1/4 mile, 0-100...etc. All tests should be
done with a standardized device like G-Tech Pro or RSM w/gforce sensor.

Anyway, 4G93P is a dinosaur engine Tongue

BTW, R3 isn't exactly Lotus tuned. The chassis and suspension design was
done in-house at Proton Motorsports.

#7
BridgestoneRE711

Posted 31 March 2005 - 07:42 PM

BridgestoneRE711

    Hot Rod

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 12,174 posts
it is lotus tuned too . hehehe ... its a stripped down and enhanced Gti .
lotus surely involved in this project .
but then over all is done by proton morosports .

#8
PotenzaG3

Posted 31 March 2005 - 11:09 PM

PotenzaG3

    Fast & Furious

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,776 posts
Honda Vtec is 1 of most powerful engine in the world, honda S2000 is
record holder for HP to ratio of weight. Honda is doing good for past few
years, the only problem is budget. But lotus is retired from F1 for many
years already... maybe their technology is not so advance right now.

but defitanely honda chasis & suspension is better than Lotus.



#9
PotenzaG3

Posted 31 March 2005 - 11:12 PM

PotenzaG3

    Fast & Furious

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,776 posts
Prozac51,

Stock EK9 0~100 km/h : 7.3 sec.
Stock 4G93P (R3) 0~100km/h: 8++ sec

so u think which is more powerful?

#10
prozac51

Posted 31 March 2005 - 11:29 PM

prozac51

    Fast & Furious

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,676 posts
"Stock EK9 0~100 km/h : 7.3 sec.
Stock 4G93P (R3) 0~100km/h: 8++ sec

so u think which is more powerful? "

My friend, an R3 owner already tested his car on the century sprint with
a G-Tech Pro. Result?

7.23 sec Evil

But I think that EK9 driver could do better Tongue