Jump to content

Welcome to Autoworld Forum !

Sign In or Register to gain full access to our forums. By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

Close
Photo

WRX or Mit Evo 7.5 GTA


  • Please log in to reply

#1
ah8eng

Posted 18 May 2005 - 02:31 PM

ah8eng

    Probation

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 28 posts
a question for y'all in the know.

I'm looking for an everyday car - for work and have shortlisted to either
a WRX or a GTA7.5A. I personally prefer the misubishi because it's auto.

My friends told me to check on this forum.

Anyone have any of these cars and what's the maintenance like ?

Beng


#2
ngsh

Posted 18 May 2005 - 07:09 PM

ngsh

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 167 posts
how much will you travel with this car? This cars has very poor fuel
consumption. Full tank 48 litres will bring you 200km only. If you push
quite often, maybe 150km only.

Good as a weekend car or fun car. Not so 'economical' as everyday car.

#3
shuq

Posted 19 May 2005 - 02:24 AM

shuq

    Road Warrior

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 517 posts
yeap..true...GTA would be better choice for everyday use..

#4
ah8eng

Posted 19 May 2005 - 11:15 AM

ah8eng

    Probation

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 28 posts

Not far-lah. My daily commute is from Jalan Ampang to Dataran Merdeka -
and back.

Cannot afford to have a weekend or fun car so I thought why not combine
everyday and fun - lor.

Can't push it too often because I have baby in the back - otherwise'll
have smell of baby barf in the cabin all the time.



#5
ngsh

Posted 19 May 2005 - 01:20 PM

ngsh

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 167 posts
It that case, not so far.

My comments are directed to Impreza and EVO. Both have poor fuel
consumption. It hurts when you are stuck in a traffic jam with these cars
and you can actually see the fuel gauge needle drops.

Baby in the back? Then I would like to comment further that these cars
have very hard ride quality. So going through uneven roads, pot holes,
bumps will seriously make the passengers unbearable.

I suggest you look for 1 and go for a test drive.

It's a seriously fun car, if you don't mind the poor fuel consumption and
harsh ride.

#6
ah8eng

Posted 19 May 2005 - 02:31 PM

ah8eng

    Probation

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 28 posts
Thanks ngsh,

I did have a test drive on both - but forgot about the hard ride on the
child (still getting used to fatherhood). Good point.

Must revisit test drive with the child in the back for the puke test.

Grateful if you have any other suggestions for suitable cars now that you
have a fair idea of what my expectations are.

I'm just trying to avoid the 3 series dad sterotype.




#7
Tweeks

Posted 19 May 2005 - 07:18 PM

Tweeks

    Tokyo Drifter

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,754 posts
how about Airtrek turbo??

hahahha

#8
ngsh

Posted 19 May 2005 - 08:25 PM

ngsh

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 167 posts
sadly I cannot think of any performance car without harsh ride quality.
They are tuned that way to extract the performance out of the car. (maybe
M5 would be the one but I have sat in one b4)

I know 2 persons who own Airtrek Turbo, 1 my uncle, another a friend. My
uncle, after using it for a few months, could not 'tahan' the fuel
consumption and sold the car.

My friend, still using it now but complains of harsh ride quality. Even
asked me how to change the suspension/shocks to softer ones.

The best way I can think of is: get your wife a decent 4 door car to
ferry your child anywhere (tescos, mid valley, great eastern mall etc),
and drive a impreza or EVO when you are alone (going to office, meet up
with friends etc).

#9
SexyThang

Posted 21 May 2005 - 02:10 AM

SexyThang

    Road Warrior

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 541 posts
i would go for evo for performance but if you add the daily usage and
passengers then i think the WRX would be better. a bit quiter.

#10
scooby5

Posted 27 May 2005 - 01:46 PM

scooby5

    Fast & Furious

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,701 posts
Okay, a couple of points..... are you talking about a WRX or an STi since
this will effect the ride comfort. Are you talking about a brand spanking
new WRX / STi or an older one.

The STi's have a harsher ride than WRX's, and especially up to Version 6.
Version 7, from a personal point of view is pig ugly but the new ones now
are better.

If you are "stuck" in traffic the fuel consupmtion is no worse than any
other 2.0L engine (well not much). If you start winding up the turbo then
for sure you'll suck more juice but where there is a downside, there is
also an upside...... that lovely sound.

For an everyday car my opinion is the standard WRX would be better than
the EVO or STi since the ride on both is set for the sports ride.